This precedent, Apple says, strengthens its argument that Qualcomm can not continue to demand royalties for the patents after selling its chips. The iPhone maker claims that some of Qualcomm's patents are invalid and the company is not charging fair and reasonable rates on patents related to industry standards. It all started in January, when the iPhone manufacturer sued Qualcomm for allegedly withholding $1 billion in royalties that were owed to the Cupertino company.
As noted by our Apple-Qualcomm battle history outlined below you can see that this legal battle is going to be tough and nasty and by the looks of it today, Apple is digging in their heels to end Qualcomm's "No License, No Chips" market tactic that affects not only Apple, but Samsung and others as well.
Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intl Inc (NYSE:VRX), Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE:CMG)
Equities analysts expect that Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. will post $3.89 EPS for the current fiscal year. ILLEGAL ACTIVITY NOTICE: This article was first reported by Chaffey Breeze and is the sole property of of Chaffey Breeze.
Citing the Lexmark decision, Apple argues that once a customer buys a phone with Qualcomm technology the chip maker is already paid, and any additional royalties charged is a double-dip and a violation of US patent law.
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) wants a court to rule Qualcomm's (NASDAQ:QCOM) royalty license agreements invalid, according to Reuters. The San Diego company didn't immediately return a message seeking comment, made before regular business hours.
Halma plc (LON:HLMA) has analysts on the Bullish side this week
After $1.04 actual EPS reported by Dow Chemical Co for the previous quarter, Wall Street now forecasts 0.00% EPS growth. Susquehanna Int Gru Limited Liability Partnership stated it has 0% of its portfolio in FirstGroup plc (LON:FGP).
The license allowed Qualcomm to take a percentage of the overall selling price for the iPhone, in exchange for supplying the microchips that allow the phones to connect to cellular data networks.
One argument working in Qualcomm's favor, however: Apple and its contractors signed agreements to pay licensing fees this way.
UPS gunman had overtime grievance against firm - union
They told her to run because there had been a shooting, she told CNN, explaining she ran about a block with the workers. Wednesday's shooting prompted a massive police response in a neighbourhood near the California city's downtown area.
Bloomberg reported this morning that Apple returned fire, saying in a legal filing that evidence increasingly indicated Qualcomm's business model is "illegal". Qualcomm says that Apple breached its contract by doing so, Apple disagrees.
- The American Electric Power Company (AEP) Earns News Sentiment Rating of 0.22
- Infantino Defends VAR At Confederations Cup
- Spanish state prosecutor accuses Jose Mourinho of tax fraud
- Gillespie, Northam Win In Virginia Primaries
- Flexing Muscles Mid-Session Are These Shares: Delcath Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:DCTH)
- Bayern Munich deny interest in Ronaldo
- Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) Shares Bought by Stephens Inc. AR
- Sixers Trade For First Overall Pick In 2017 NBA Draft
- New al-Qaeda linked group claims responsibility for Mali resort attack
- Philip Morris International Inc (PM) Position Held by Northeast Investment Management